Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan NUR 590 – Online Nursing Essays

Setting and Access to Potential Subjects
8.4 points

Criteria Description

Description of setting and access to potential subjects; consent or approval form is attached in an appendix, if needed.

5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points

The setting and access to potential subjects are clearly described. A well-developed and accurate consent or approval form is attached correctly in an appendix.

The setting and access to potential subjects are described. A consent or approval form is needed and attached in an appendix. Minor revision may be needed on the form or to correct formatting issues in the appendix. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points

The setting and access to potential subjects are generally described. Some additional information is needed. A consent or approval form is attached but requires some revision; the form is attached in an appendix but has formatting errors.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points

The setting and access to potential subjects are only partially described. A consent or approval form is attached but contains significant errors; the form is not attached in an appendix.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

The setting and access to potential subjects are not described. A consent or approval form needs to be created and attached in an appendix. Revision is needed.

Timeline
9.6 points

Criteria Description

Description of time required; draft of timeline is attached in an appendix.

5. 5: Excellent
9.6 points

The amount of time needed to complete this project is clearly described and general enough to be implemented at any date. A well-developed timeline is attached correctly in an appendix.

The amount of time needed to complete this project is described and general enough to be implemented at any date. Minor revision may be needed on the timeline, or to correct formatting issues in the Appendix. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

3. 3: Satisfactory
8.45 points

The amount of time needed to complete this project is generally described. Some additional information is needed. A timeline is attached but requires some revision; the timeline is attached in an appendix but has formatting errors.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.68 points

The amount of time needed to complete this project is only partially described. A timeline is attached but contains significant errors; the timeline is not attached in an appendix.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

The amount of time needed to complete this project is not described. A timeline needs to be created and attached in an appendix. Revision is needed.

Budget and Resource List
9.6 points

Criteria Description

Description of resources or changes required; outline of cost and budget and resource list are attached in an appendix.

5. 5: Excellent
9.6 points

A detailed description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are clearly presented. A well-developed budget and resource list are attached correctly in an appendix.

Description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are presented. Minor revision maybe needed on the budget or resource list, or to correct formatting issues in the appendix. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

3. 3: Satisfactory
8.45 points

Description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are generally presented. Some additional information is needed. A budget and resource list are attached but require some revision; the list is attached in an appendix but has formatting errors. Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan NUR 590

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.68 points

Description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are partially presented. A budget and resource list are attached but contain significant errors; the list is not attached in an appendix.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are omitted. A budget and resource list need to be created and attached in an appendix. Revision is needed.

Research Design
8.4 points

Criteria Description

Quantitative or qualitative design to collect data and evaluate effectiveness.

5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points

A research design is selected. A thorough explanation for how the design will be used to collect data and evaluate effectiveness of the evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. Strong rationale is provided for support.

A research design is selected. An explanation of how the design will be used to collect data and evaluate effectiveness of the evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. Adequate rationale is provided for support.

3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points

A research design is selected. A general explanation of how the design will be used to collect data and evaluate effectiveness of the evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. More rational is needed for support.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points

A research design is selected. It is unclear how the design will be used to collect data and evaluate effectiveness of the evidence-based practice project proposal.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Research design is not selected.

Methods and Instruments
8.4 points

Criteria Description

Methods or instruments used for monitoring implementation.

5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points

The methods or instruments used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution are described. Minor revision may be needed for the methods or instruments, or to correct formatting issues in the appendix. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

The methods or instruments used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution are thoroughly described. The methods or instruments are accurate and correctly attached in an appendix.

3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points

The methods or instruments used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution are summarized, but more information is needed. The methods or instruments are attached but require some revision; the list is attached in an appendix but has formatting errors.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points

The methods or instruments used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution are only partially discussed. A methods or instruments are attached but contain significant errors; the methods or instruments are not attached in an appendix.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

The methods or instruments are omitted. The methods or instruments need to be created and attached in an appendix.

Process for Delivering Intervention and Needed Training
8.4 points

Criteria Description

Process for Delivering Intervention and Needed Training

5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points

The process for delivering the intervention and any needed training is summarized. More information or support is needed.

The process for delivering the intervention and any needed training is explained. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points

Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan NUR 590 The process for delivering the intervention and any needed training is thoroughly explained. Strong rationale is provided for support.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points

The process for delivering the intervention is only partially described.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

The process for delivering the intervention is omitted.

Stakeholders for Implementation
8.4 points

Criteria Description

Stakeholders for Implementation

5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points

A thorough discussion of stakeholders needed to implement the plan is presented. Strong rationale is provided for support.

Stakeholders needed to implement the plan are omitted.

3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points

A summary of stakeholders needed to implement the plan is presented. More information or support is needed.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points

An adequate discussion of stakeholders needed to implement the plan is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

The discussion of stakeholders needed to implement the plan is incomplete.

Barriers or Challenges to Plan and Strategies for Overcoming
8.4 points

Criteria Description

Barriers or Challenges to Plan and Strategies for Overcoming

5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points

Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are thoroughly discussed and clear strategies for overcoming these are proposed. Strong rationale is provided for support.

Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are discussed and strategies for overcoming these are proposed. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points

Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are only partially discussed.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points

Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are summarized. General strategies for overcoming these are presented.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are not discussed.

Evidence of Feasibility
8.4 points

Criteria Description

Evidence of Feasibility

5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points

The feasibility of the implementation plan is thoroughly discussed. Strong rationale is provided for support.

The feasibility of the implementation plan is only partially discussed.

3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points

The feasibility of the implementation plan is discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points

The feasibility of the implementation plan is outlined. More information or support is needed to demonstrate the feasibility of the plan.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

The feasibility of the implementation plan is not discussed.

Required Sources
6 points

Criteria Description

Required Sources

5. 5: Excellent
6 points

Number of required resources is met. Sources are current and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points

Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points

Number of required sources is only partially met.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Sources are not included.

Thesis Development and Purpose
8.4 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction
9.6 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. 5: Excellent
9.6 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. 3: Satisfactory
8.45 points

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.68 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Mechanics of Writing
6 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.

5. 5: Excellent
6 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Paper Format
6 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment.

5. 5: Excellent
6 points

All format elements are correct.

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources
6 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources Citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.

5. 5: Excellent
6 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points

Sources are not documented.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Improving 3-Hour Sepsis Bundled Care Outcomes: Implementation of a Nurse-Driven Sepsis Protocol in the Emergency Department

Read “Improving 3-Hour Sepsis Bundled Care Outcomes: Implementation of a Nurse-Driven Sepsis Protocol in the Emergency Department,” by Moor
… Read More

30 Safe Practices for Better Health Care

Read “30 Safe Practices for Better Health Care,” located in the Archive section of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) we
… Read More

Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice

Review Chapter 1 in Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice.

Implementation Science Training and Resources for Nurses and Nurse Scientists

Read “Implementation Science Training and Resources for Nurses and Nurse Scientists,” by Boehm, Stolldorf, and Jeffery, from Journal of
… Read More

Center for Theory of Change

Explore the Center for Theory of Change website.

Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice

Read Chapter 25 in Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice.

Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession

Read Chapter 20 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.

Strategies, Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice in Community Nursing: A Systematic Mixed-Studies Review and Qualitative Synthesis

Read “Strategies, Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice in Community Nursing: A Systematic Mixed-Studies Revie
… Read More

The Teach Back Project: A System-Wide Evidence Based Practice

Read “The Teach Back Project: A System-Wide Evidence Based Practice,” by Klingbeil and Gibson, from Journal of Pediatric Nursing (
… Read More

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 50 Use the following coupon code : SAVE15